According to Global Forum on MSM and HIV, the Global Network of Sex Work Projects (NSWP), The Global Network of Trans Women and HIV (IRGT), Global Action for Trans Equality (GATE), and MSMGF (The Global Forum on MSM & HIV) together with the Global Platform to Fast-Track the HIV and Human Rights Responses Among Gay and Bisexual Men and Other Men Who Have Sex with Men (The Platform) are deeply disappointed by the adoption of a flawed Political Declaration today at the United Nations High-Level Meeting on Ending AIDS (HLM). The Political Declaration inexcusably fails to meaningfully address the HIV epidemic among key populations, including gay and bisexual men and other men who have sex with men, sex workers, people who use drugs, and transgender people.
The Global Forum on MSM and HIV also registered the Final Declaration damagingly excludes and misrepresents key populations. It also lacks an explicit commitment to support and finance key population-led and tailored prevention, care, and treatment services. Likewise, it is woefully misses the mark in highlighting legal and policy frameworks that stigmatize and criminalize our communities worldwide. While the document opens with a sweeping “commitment to end the AIDS epidemic by 2030,” our networks and many of its global civil society allies contend that today’s Political Declaration is a significant set-back in our work to end AIDS, particularly among key populations.
They also said the Russian delegation briefly reopened negotiations on the political declaration, offering one final opportunity for member states to propose changes to an unacceptably weak document. However, the Russian delegation withdrew their concerns, and the final declaration was adopted during the HLM opening plenary meeting.
Immediately following adoption, numerous delegations including those from Egypt, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Indonesia, and the Holy See made statements condemning the explicit mention of key populations in the declaration, and expressed dismay that the 2016 Declaration no longer called for abstinence and fidelity to be included in HIV prevention programs. Several member states, including Australia, Canada, Honduras, and the United States, countered by expressing their disappointment that the final Declaration did not go further in its commitment to key populations. Other friendly Member States remained politely silent or understated in their interventions.
Prior to HLM, conservative Members States rejected accreditation of several civil society organizations to attend the meeting for several organizations led by key populations, including gay men and other men who have sex with men, transgender people and people who use drugs. This turned out to foreshadow rapid endorsement of a flawed Political Declaration, with no opportunity to openly deliberate. The High-level Meeting has also revealed the willingness by many global HIV actors to treat key populations as dispensable.